Japanese crossword #2205
| Size: 25x25 | Picture: | Difficulty: | Added: | 13.04.14 |
0:00:00
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COMMENTS
thanks
Good
Wonder was it just me but I found this quite difficult at the start. Nice puzzle and good picture.
Not just you, Richard. It's a challenging puzzle. :)
Average for me. About 35 minutes to solve (no hint, no guess).
I used "recursion" for 2 zones.
I used "recursion" for 2 zones.
show: 5 🗨
show: 4 🗨
Okay, so here's AI's version: Recursive thinking involves solving complex problems by breaking them down into smaller, identical subproblems. This approach is often used in computer science and other fields to tackle intricate tasks by repeatedly applying a similar process to simpler versions of the original problem.
Does that make it clear??
Does that make it clear??
show: 3 🗨
I know what recursion is. I was questioning how it was used here.
show: 2 🗨
I was kind of tongue in cheek with the final question... I think the OP was just trying to look smart. ;-)
show: 1 🗨
Quite interesting puzzle.
Average difficulty if you're an advanced player.
It might be hair pulling if you're not.
It might be hair pulling if you're not.
show: 4 🗨
show: 2 🗨
There are some advanced logics that are not that obvious. With time and thinking you eventually learn them.
For example, the nonogram 1955 was impossible for me. I practiced around 50 nonograms with similar sizes and high difficulty rating. I learned a few new tricks wich allowed me to finally make it.
For example, the nonogram 1955 was impossible for me. I practiced around 50 nonograms with similar sizes and high difficulty rating. I learned a few new tricks wich allowed me to finally make it.
show: 1 🗨
I remember the one with Mont Saint-Michel, that was really hard, took me forever. Or maybe I wasn't advanced yet.
When you know the tricks obviously, in combination with detecting the problem lines/spots in the shortest time possible.
It took me one and a half hour, but the end result is satisfying : )
Very tricky at start, but then it flows very easily.
took 11.54...tricky but not too bad without x's...what is recursion?
show: 2 🗨
I got stuck at about 10 minutes and if I don't see a step very soon, I'm going to leave the puzzle and come back another time for a fresh look. As for "recursion," check out my response to Onono above and see if that helps any. (Spoiler: It probably won't.)
show: 1 🗨